Melanin occurs in humans as well, so there’s some resemblances here. Melanin controls pigmentation in hair, skin and eyes and the more of it you have, the darker your pigmentation will be. This is a nice example of ‘we are all just human’, as the level of melanin is controlled by exposure to sun (by our ancestors) and genetics. An interesting thing to note here is that melanin protects your cells and genetic material by absorbing UV rays and redirecting them elsewhere. This is why the more time you spend in the sun, the more melanin you will produce. Tanning is not so cool when you realise its a defense mechanism kicking into action. We digress…Goats are not that different, and they have two types of melanin (humans have three, I think?).
- Eumelanin, which produces black/blue-grey/chocolate-brown pigments &
- Pheomelanin, which produces the creams & almost whites/reds and tan pigments which can vary wildly to appear dark enough to be misread as eumelanin colors.
Goats are distinct on paper, and how we define or label their colors and patterns based only on the resulting layout of the pigmented areas. White spotting, or entirely white goat does not make this a white goat. On the contrary, white areas lack pigment and as such, hides the base color of the goat (or color of the area where the white occurs). White spotting can be extensive, or occur on small areas and is like slapping white duct-tape on the goat. You cannot see what is under it, but it isn’t white. In cases like this, a give-away of the base color can be a small clue like a color elsewhere on the goat. A white goat is thus either a goat of any base color, completely obscured by white spotting (and truly not white, but appearing so) or a goat with its primary colors from the pheomelanin pool, diluted to be so light that they appear white.
It is difficult to read, but becomes easier with time.
I call the resulting colors and patterns a layout, as it is like a final render of the locations and colors of the pigments. This final render, this print that is your goat is the result of a soup of eumelanin, pheomelanin and white spotting. The amount of pigment from each of the two melanins is controlled by the agouti locus (the gene at the agouti [symbol A] location, remember?). It’s like a printer, controlling different levels of red, green and blue to produce colors; perhaps not that simple though.
From this agouti locus both black and white goats can be rendered, and an infinite amount of variations of color distribution can occur in stripes and spots and patterns, which shows itself in almost similar ways on goats (especially the face) which can be used to start identifying the base color/s of the goat. The pheomelanic tans are dominant, and thus are rendered on to this final print in a variety of shapes and ‘brightness’ levels over the goat (with its different alleles).
Striping can be completely omitted on white and black goats, which are two patterns coming from the agouti locus; this is recessive: no marking/stripes. If they are completely black, they are completely eumelanic. If they are completely white (or completely tan) they got the dominant tan allele and are totally pheomelanic. The genetic makeup that ‘prints’ a downright white or black goat, can not be determined by just judging the base color of the goat (even if it seems obvious). Summarised vehemently, the agouti locus can account for variations that can be correctly black (yielding black goats) to solid whites to variations in patterns and pigments from the two melanins.
There is, to add more confusion, the brown locus which turns blacks (and only blacks) to browns of varying degrees from light to dark browns – sometimes even on the same goat. Commonly, where the black and tans would puzzle together, the browns and tans form a new agouti pattern. I think this is where a lot of confusion stems from when it comes to the “dark tan” and “light tan”, or “dark red” descriptions we see a lot; forgivable, as the dark pheomelanins can accompany light eumelanins and look similar enough to be judged incorrectly.
Markings on Nigerian dwarf goats can vary from roaning (where white hairs diffuse the black/brown causing it to appear greyish), to ticking (smaller spots), flowering, belting, polling on the head (usually white) and moonspots (round, random tan’ish colors that appear on any color of the goat).
I have said this earlier, but after converting all our notes, observations, memories and advice to writing, it’s hard to tell if this is useful or not. Identifying your goat colors should be taken at bite size, taking every piece of the information at hand into consideration and judging down from there. Most of the information comes from various sources, and I remember reading some PDF’s which I can’t find anymore. Other bits are from Alexia’s notes, memory, forums and more notes that formed a chaotic mess, and putting it to this page helped me piece things together. If there are any errors or misleading bits, inform me so that I can reword, rephrase and retry. One thing is for certain, the passionate breeders out there are serious about knowing what they are doing, and that’s worth tipping a hat to. If any of their information made it to my notes, I am thankful; if any of their information is incorrect, we forgive and learn.